All posts by Abby

The Golden Compass and me

I’m pre-writing this entry on Sunday, prior to the teen book group’s Tuesday discussion of Philip Pullman’s The Golden Compass.  While in graduate school, I had to read The Golden Compass, and totally hated it; the hatred was probably mostly driven by my unadulterated hatred of the professor of my fantasy and science fiction class, but perhaps also partly by the book, too.  Because, lazy little reader that I’ve become, I’m struggling with this book once again.  It’s such hard work.  It makes me think.  And thinking makes me cranky.

Clearly, Pullman is brilliant, and has an amazing creative vision for this book and its sequels.  It’s not a book to try to skim quickly on Super Bowl Sunday before heading to a friend’s house for the game, though that’s what I’m trying to do.  And the depth of the fantasy in the text reminds me that I’m not really a fantasy reader – I struggle with many of the fantasy conventions and with things like daemons and Dust and althiometers.  So while I recognize Pullman’s genius, I can’t say that I’m engaged in the text.  I’d rather be reading the book for the older teen book group:  Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility.  Delicate observations on humanity, gentle romance, and an ultimately optimistic view of the world and its people: that’s the kind of book that I like to read, not fantasy. 

Hyacinth

While buying groceries two weeks ago, I picked up two blue hyacinths for $3.99 each – a nice splurge, I thought, one for home, one for my desk at work.

I had forgotten that hyacinths have an overwhelmingly powerful scent, and worried that I’d have complaints from patrons at work, especially after I came into the children’s room one morning and the whole room reeked of hyacinth.

But the hyacinth has been a HUGE hit.  Patrons come into the room, lift their noses up a bit and sniff, and then wistful, wonderfully happy smiles burst across their faces as they say, “Oh, that flower smells so GOOD!  It’s like spring is here!”  And to a one, each patron comes over to the hyacinth, lifts its heavy flower stalk, and breathes in deep.  Children get lifted up by their parents to smell the flower.  And everyone is happy.

Well, ok, not everyone.  Lisa and Mary admit to hating the smell of hyacinth, and stay on the far side of the children’s room desk when they need to talk to me about something.  And the first night that our home hyacinth was in flower, Jim greeted me with, “Is this flower new or something?  It STINKS!”  So, with Mary and Lisa in mind, the next bunch of forced bulbs that are working to flower on my desk are some yellow narcissus – the ones that look like daffodils, and, to the best of my memory, don’t smell like much.  And at home, for Jim’s sake, we’ll be sticking to gerber daisies. 

But meanwhile, it’s been great fun bringing smiles to so many faces in the library. 

Magyk & Guys Read

This past Tuesday, the 6th grade book group met to discuss Magyk by Angie Sage.  This group, which used to be thriving, is definitely suffering from various middle school “things”:  the girls have drifted towards realistic fiction that addresses issues that are important to them, while the boys have wholly shifted to a preference for action, adventure, and fantasy; each of the kids has a much more demanding extracurricular schedule now, so all nine group members never attend at the same time (this last meeting only four could attend); and there is a lot more homework in 6th grade, meaning some of the kids simply can’t finish the book group books, and thus have little to discuss at our meetings.

With that in mind, our discussion was ok, but not great.  One of the four attendees hadn’t read more than the first page of the book, since he thought the first page was boring (this really surprised me, because I had predicted to myself that this particular boy would love Magyk), and one other boy hadn’t been able to finish the book, leaving just two kids and me to really discuss it.  Luckily, the two kids who had read the book in its entirety are both huge Angie Sage fans, and have read the entire trilogy, so they had a lot to say and intrigued the rest of us with previews of the other two books, Flyte and Physik. 

But I left the meeting thinking that perhaps I need to create a “Guys Read” book group for the middle school boys.  I really, really hate to separate the boys from the girls, but it’s becoming increasingly clear that by the middle of 6th grade the tastes of each group are completely opposite.  It is beyond difficult for me to pick books for the 6th grade group and for the 7th – 9th grade teen group that will appeal to both the boys and the girls.  I end up alternating genres from one month to the next, losing the interest of the boys one month, and of the girls the next month.  And then there’s the issue of attendance: inevitably there are months in which there is only one girl attending or only one boy attending book group, and that one boy or one girl feels very awkward and uncomfortable. 

What to do?  Should I create a “Guys Read” group?  Or is better to keep the groups as is, and emphasize that being a member of a book group entails reading books that one wouldn’t normally pick for oneself?  I’m leaning towards the latter option, but would love input from others.

Five Children and It

At the last 5th grade book group meeting, we discussed E. Nesbit’s Five Children and It.  Without a doubt, this was our best book discussion ever, and I give all the credit for that to the kids in the group. 

About half of our discussion progressed in the usual way, sharing what each of us liked and disliked about the book, trying to figure out anything that puzzled us along the way, and such.  But then one of the kids reminded me that I had mentioned that J.K. Rowling specifically talks about E. Nesbit as being one of the authors who has influenced her the most.  “Why is that?” asked all of the kids.

So I read aloud a quote I had found from J.K. Rowling, which states that Rowling feels more connection with Nesbit than with any other author.  As a group, we tried to figure out why Rowling would say that.  One kid suggested that they both write fantasy, and we all agreed that was true, but that there must be more of a connection between the two writers for Rowling to say what she did. 

Eventually, we teased out that Nesbit’s fantasy takes place in the real world, and is experienced by only a few chosen characters, and that Rowling’s wizards coexist with unknowing muggles in a world that is real aside from the fantasical elements.  Everyone was fully involved in this discussion, and it was engaging, quick-paced, and certainly opened my eyes to an aspect of both Nesbit’s and Rowling’s books that I had never consciously thought about before.

Midway through this conversation, M. exclaimed loudly, “This is SO cool!!  I wish our book groups at school could be like this!!!!” 

Which was so cool for me – because I love these book group discussions, and it’s so rewarding to know that the kids do, too.

I’m still here

Though my blog has been silent for the last week or so, I’m still here.  Things are looking up in library-land: Jen, our fabulous new part-time children’s, part-time reference librarian, is now on her third day of work here, and is quickly moving up to warp speed.  Jen’s arrival means no more six day work weeks for me (yay!), and thus I’ll actually have free time at home to post regularly to my blog (double yay!).

Last week was a big one, and I’ll write posts tomorrow and the next day on the 5th grade book group’s discussion of Five Children and It (it was a terrific discussion, our best yet), and on Hugh Hanley’s visit to the library on Saturday for his “Circle of Songs” program (which was a big hit, of course).  But for now it’s back to preparation for today’s book group, the 6th grade discussion of Magyk by Angie Sage.

The joys of automation

We’re getting a dishwasher, my dad’s Christmas gift to us, and I couldn’t be more excited.  For the past almost four years, Jim and I have been grumpily washing our dishes by hand, often procrastinating until there’s a large stack of dirty dishes on the counter.  On those hot and humid summer days (we don’t really use our air conditioner), washing dishes becomes just plain nasty.  And it can even be pretty unpleasant in the winter, when the woodstove is cranked up high.  But not much longer, because the dishwasher has been paid for and ordered, and Jim is busy reconfiguring the cabinets to make room for that lovely beast.

We gained new respect for another bit of automation recently, when our washing machine needed repairs and we were without it for three weeks (including the week that my sister was visiting us).  It’s not that laundromats are so bad, because there are actually some advantages of going to the laundromat, most notably that you can get your laundry done in one fell swoop.  But when your towels get smelly mid-week, and you can’t take the time to go to the laundromat, there’s nothing more lovely than being able to pop down to the basement and run a load.  When our machine was finally fixed last Friday, I was so inspired by its renewed presence in our lives that I actually tackled all those laundry odds and ends that accumulate in a stack by the washer:  the random red items that will stain everything else, and so get put to the side – the old curtains that we used as dropcloths during a project – the pesky woolen washables.  All clean now.

Automation rocks.

What makes a good children’s librarian, part V

Programming.  The term programming encompasses both library-run programs such as storytimes and performers hired to give a show or educational presentation.  As I’ve discussed ad nauseum in past posts, I’ve been focusing a lot of my energy this past year on changing the structure and format of the library’s storytimes to reflect the current philosophies on age division and program content for library storytimes.  Perhaps research in the future will suggest additional changes to storytimes, and it will be important for me to keep on top of that current research and not rest on my laurels.  But also it probably would be a bad idea to change the storytime structure too frequently: patrons like and appreciate a certain amount of predictability in their library programs. 

As for performers, the challenge lies not just in how much your budget can afford (see Part IV of this series), but also in finding those performers who are worth hiring.  There are several great resources available, including the Massachusetts performer’s directory; a new blog that has been established for MA children’s and youth services librarians to leave comments on specific performers (though the blog doesn’t seem to be getting much use or attention, which is a shame); the MASSYAC list serve, which I have found to be extremely useful; and regional roundtable discussions.  I’ve decided that when I receive a performer’s promotional flyer in the mail that looks intriguing, the best course of action is to look through my MASSYAC files for comments on the performer, and to look through my notes from roundtable discussions, and to look at the performer’s directory to see what libraries are listed as places of recent appearances, and then to go to the performer’s website and hope that there is a sample performance video.  If I have any questions after doing all that, it’s worth publishing an open question on MASSYAC and see what responses people have.

Obviously, depending on the size of your budget, you can only hire so many performers a year, and thus much of a children’s room’s programming needs to be library-run.  Some great low-cost, rewarding options include book groups with snacks, movie nights, craft programs, and game hours.

And thus ends this series on what makes a good children’s librarian.  There are many other aspects of being a successful children’s librarian that I could include, but it seems wise to stop here, having covered the major essentials of the job. 

What makes a good children’s librarian, part IV

I really wanted to put programming next on my list of what makes a good children’s librarian, but I’ve decided to give precedence to budget and organization.  A hard choice, and perhaps programming should really be number four on the list, but let’s see if I can justify this decision.

Budgets are hard.  Very hard.  Librarians love books, obviously, and when reading book reviews in the assorted review journals at our disposal we see many, many books that look fabulous and exciting and just perfect for our library.  But the selection process must be driven first by how much money we have available for materials, and then we need to make sure that we’re fairly dividing our money spent amongst the areas we need to address.  And this is where that amazing thing called Microsoft Excel comes into play.  Kathy, the treasurer of the Friends of the library, taught me how to use Excel, and in that lesson she said to me, “Excel is the best program ever written – it’s awesome.”  She’s right, of course.  With Excel, it’s so easy to create a spreadsheet divided by month and category (the categories being dependent on how your library sorts the collection – at our library, the divisions are JJ, JE, J, AR, YA, CD’s, DVD’s, Replacement copies, and books on CD), and to use that spreadsheet to make sure no one category is too heavy, or another one shortchanged.

And then, of course, Excel works beautifully for an ongoing record of monies spent on program supplies and performers.  Once set up, it’s so easy to add the $7.47 spent for refreshments for a book group, or the $22.01 spent for workshop supplies, or to lay out the performers coming in the year ahead and predict how much money will be left for other programming expenses. 

Which leads nicely into organization.  I’ve been accused of being, well, wicked organized, and I agree that I’m guilty.  My personal philosophy on organization is this:  it’s only responsible to leave a clear paper trail in any job as complex as that of children’s librarian.  As an example, one week I wasn’t in on Friday, and on Thursday I had forgotten to do the prep work for the teen volunteer-run Saturday Storytime.  Ooops, my bad.  Luckily, though, Lisa was able to go into my computer files and find the “Storytime Today” door sign in those files.  But even more than a simple example like that, it’s also important for our own sanity of mind to have everything clearly in writing.  At the end of a summer reading program, I may think to myself, “Of course I’ll remember which prizes were most popular, and how many I ordered of each kind!”, but the reality is that no one’s memory is that good, and I’d be kicking myself come December if I didn’t keep clear records of all those statistics to aid in my ordering for the coming summer program.  So, organize, organize, organize, and keep a shelf full of notebooks with all that organized information in paper form, just in case the computer crashes. 

And next we have:  Programming…

The Printz Award

I couldn’t be more pleased with this year’s winner of the Michael Printz award for young adult literature:  Geraldine McCaughrean’s The White Darkness.  I love, love, love, LOVE this book, but I was beginning to feel like some sort of oddity who has terrible taste in literature; like I had lost my touch for recognizing the great books.  The teen book group regularly refers to “that book,” and they all laugh at how they felt forced to be kind when writing their opinions on the book for this blog, since they knew that Geraldine McCaughrean would be reading their opinions and they didn’t want to hurt her feelings.  And then I recommended The White Darkness to one of my coworkers (whom I respect greatly), and she came back to me a few days later and stuck her tongue out and said, “Yuck!  I hated that book!  I couldn’t even finish it!!”

The book is a bit dark, a bit odd, and definitely unique.  Perhaps it doesn’t appeal to everyone, but to my mind it is a contemporary classic that will stand the test of time, and its selection as this year’s winner of the Printz award makes complete and total sense to this reader.  (And now I feel rather virtuous about the three extra copies of the book in my library’s collection, which I had to purchase for the book group.  Solid evidence that I know good stuff when I read it.  Because it’s all about me, of course.  :)  )

What makes a good children’s librarian, part III

Reference services.  Vital to the job, yet I do put reference services third on the list when talking about a children’s librarian.  As discussed in previous posts, if you’re not approachable, and if you haven’t established with your patrons that you have an excellent knowledge of children’s literature, you won’t have earned the trust of your patrons, and they won’t come to ask you those reference questions.

In a perfect world, the schools and the public library would communicate freely and regularly about school assignments, but the truth is that teachers have many balls in the air and work many hours a week (the best teachers I’ve known have worked 60+ hours a week), and it well may slip their minds to inform the public library about upcoming assignments.  A good children’s librarian will make sure the lines of communication to the school are open and available, yet won’t make a pest of him or herself in an attempt to learn of assignments.  So, once again, it’s important to keep ears and eyes open, watching for assignments that have just been issued, and to also keep a log each year of assignments and the dates of their occurrence, and the volume of materials required to fulfill the needs for that assignment.  And when requesting books from other libraries to flesh out the collection for a given assignment, watch for books of value that you don’t have in your own collection.  If the assignment will reoccur in future years, purchase those additional books for your collection.

An interesting part of reference services in a children’s room is holding back and observing.  Many parents want to teach their children the necessary skills to locate materials in the library catalog, and many of those parents do an excellent job teaching their children.  It can be tempting to jump in and help a parent/child team with their searching skills, but it’s so important to value the bonding aspect of this family interaction.  Though I have no scientific proof of this, I suspect that a child who learns to navigate the library from a parent will become a life-long library user, much like the child who has been read to on a daily basis by a parent and who observes a parent reading for pleasure is more likely to be a life-long reader than a child who doesn’t have those parental role models.  When I witness a parent and child searching the catalog together, I pay close attention, but only jump in to help if I see the pair going far astray or becoming frustrated. 

In contrast, there are times when a child comes in to the children’s room by him or herself and desperately needs assistance finding materials for a school assignment.  In those cases, time permitting, I love to take the time to go beyond just locating materials, and teach the child a few tricks for searching on their own.  This is obvious to the job description of a reference librarian, but to teach children well you must first have that affinity for and relationship with the kids that I discussed in the first post of the series.  It all ties together, see? 

Coming up:  Budget and organization.